NEVADA CORRUPTION DOT INFO
Publisher: Guy P. Felton III
Have YOU been victimized by Nevada's corrupt legal system?
Mike Weston has and he's fighting back.
Bad luck put Mike Weston in the wrong places at the wrong times in recent years and he was involved in two traffic accidents not of his own making. One of these put Mike out of commission for over a year and he was unable to work.
As a result, he has since been unusually aware of road travel and has often reported unsafe highway conditions to the Nevada Highway Patrol. However, Mike has learned that the NHP doesn't appreciate being notified about dangerous drivers and large areas of black ice on the road, etc. On one occasion, he was treated so rudely by NHP officers ~ including Officer Edward Bowers ~ that he notified upline officials from the governor on down. This kicked a few officers into vendetta mode against Mike. (Officers who should be rated as unfit for law enforcement duties and terminated from public service ~ along with supervisory officers who are failing to keep their people in line. Public servants who display ominous and sinister conduct should be identified and punished. Especially when they are mistakenly trusted to carry lethal weapons.)
On June 19, 2005, Mike was run off Interstate 80 near the Keystone exit in Reno by two vehicles traveling at extremely high speed. When Mike returned to the road, he soon came upon an NHP cruiser on the shoulder of the highway. Its driver, Officer Edward Bowers by great coincidence, had stopped a pickup truck and was in process of issuing a speeding citation to the truck's driver.
Mike stopped his car, a Mercury Grand Marquis, behind the cruiser, a Ford Crown Victoria. After waiting at least three minutes to observe the officer's situation and to determine that the officer was not engaged in a threatening scenario, Mike approached Bowers to report that he had just been run off the road by two drivers who posed a clear and present danger to other vehicles. Bowers quickly recognized Mike as a person who had previously criticized him. Bowers' focus shifted to Mike being a critic and he, Bowers, indicated no concern with Mike's close avoidance of what might have been a fatal accident ~ nor with the clear and present danger to other vehicles posed by the two speeding vehicles Mike reported to him.
Without issuing a warning to Mike, as mandated by law, Bowers issued a citation to Mike for obstructing and delaying a peace officer. An audio-video tape proves this to be nonsense. The tape was shot by a camera onboard the NHP cruiser. Mike was fully cooperative with Bowers; the tape documents this.
On August 19, 2005, Mike found himself in a kangaroo court with "Judge" Fidel Salcedo presiding. During this scenario Mike was victimized by an edited audio-video tape, complete with a perverted timestamp, and by Officer Bowers lying under oath (perjury).
Mike is now requesting a new hearing. See below:
State of Nevada v. Michael Weston, Case RCV 2005-023211
File: Michael Weston, 5-15-08GROUNDS FOR NEW HEARING
Suppression of evidence
Tampered evidence
Perjury ~ false statements
Clerk "Robin" denied Weston's right to appeal when she told him at the last moment that he needed an affidavit.
Time code was altered on the Nevada Highway Patrol audio-video tape.
Court/NHP did not permit Weston to review said audio-video tape before his day in court (August 19, 2005).
Judge Salcedo denied Weston's right to enter a relevant complaint letter and relevant response letter from Senator Harry Reid regarding an earlier complaint against the NHP.
Only 3 minutes of the NHP audio-video tape were shown in court out of a total time of 22 minutes.
Weston was forced by Bowers to restage a verbal exchange in front of the NHP cruiser's camera. The restage was substituted on the "official" tape in place of the original exchange!
Weston's car was searched without his permission by NHP officers and he, Weston, was ordered to not observe this search.
Bowers' audio-video tape and the court transcript were both altered after Weston contacted Nevada Public Safety about discrepancies in the audio-video tape played during Weston's day in court. Withheld evidence was crucial to proving Weston's innocence regarding any wrong-doing.
During Bowers' testimony in court, he stated, under oath, that Weston came up to him and said, "Excuse me, excuse me, I want to talk to you about SUVs and pickups." This statement is not depicted on the audio-video tape as Bowers claimed when Weston first approached him.
The Court refused to give a copy of the NHP's audio-video tape to Weston for his review and evaluation until after the deadline for filing an appeal.
The Court outright lied to Weston regarding the procedure for obtaining a transcript of his day in court. This to frustrate Weston's procuring said transcript.
"Kelly" at the District Attorney's Office informed Weston that evidence had been destroyed and then changed her story to say she didn't know who had custody of said evidence. Weston was later permitted to obtain a copy of the evidence (audio-video tape) after the appeal period expired.
The audio-video tape documents that Kinard asked Bowers, "Did you tell him to hold off (i.e., give Weston due warning)?" Bowers replied, "Yes, I did." Kinard then asked Bowers, "Did Weston do anything else wrong?" Bowers answered, "No." Bowers, in fact, never gave due warning to Weston.
During the Court proceeding, there was no discussion regarding Weston having been (or not having been) given due notice before he was cited as required by law. Weston was not given due notice at the time of the subject incident.
The Prosecutor asked Bowers if the audio-video tape shown in Court depicted the true events that transpired. Bowers answered, "Yes." Bowers lied in that the tape had been edited ~ not only for time, but also to leave out crucial evidence in Weston's favor.
Judge Salcedo ignored Weston's reporting to him that Court Clerk "Robin" did not permit him to file appeal papers.
While pursuing his case, Weston was harassed and stopped on the road a total of 6 times by NHP officers for ridiculous and fraudulent reasons.
Third-party hearsay evidence against Weston was used by the Prosecutor during her closing argument.
The Department of Public Safety made 2 trips to the evidence room on the 9th and 15th of December 2005 to retrieve and return the Weston audio-video tape. This was before Weston was permitted to copy the tape. Who did what with the tape before permitting Weston's close evaluation of it?
Weston was made to feel that pursuing justice in his case was discouraged by Court officials and that the NHP would maliciously retaliate against him should he persist in doing so.
If Weston is denied fair review of his maltreatment by the Court and the NHP, he will be forced to pursue related litigation in federal court and also sue for heavy punitive damages in the amount of one million dollars.
Copies:
FBI (Read their "We don't give a damn" reply below.)
Senator Harry Reid & other federal officials
Senator William Raggio & other Nevada officials
Media including the Los Angeles Times
Guy Felton, Publisher of www.NevadaCorruption.Info
District Court
Legal Counsel
Harvard Law School
THE FBI IS PART OF THE PROBLEM!
BELOW IS A REPLY LETTER TO WESTON FROM
AGENT STEVEN M. MARTINEZ & AGENT MICHAEL A. WEST.June 2, 2008
Dear Mr. Weston
RE: Complaint against Edward Bowers
The FBI has reviewed your complaint of May 20, 2008, wherein you allege you have been the victim of a civil rights violation. Based on the review of your complaint information, no investigation will be initiated.
Enclosed with this letter please find the following items you provided to our office on May 23, 2008:
One VHS tape containing the video of Trooper Bowers dashboard camera depicting the incident; one DVD containing the audio from Reno Justice Court depicting the bench trial for Weston's citation; one copy of the bench trial transcript; one copy of the letter from Office of Professional Responsibility (DPS); one copy of the letter to George Togliatti; one copy of Weston's appeal letter; one copy of the ACLU complaint form; one copy of NRS 197.190; one copy of letter to the Nevada Commission of Judicial Discipline; one copy of of a response letter from the Commission of Judicial Discipline; one copy of a response letter from Senator Harry Reid; one copy of a newspaper article; and one copy of a sheet of paper with Nevada State Crimes.
Publisher's comment: Martinez and West are asked to explain why they, in effect, refer above to evidence tampering, perjury, and judicial fraud as civil rights violations. This, of course, is bullshit!
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE BRENT ADAMS
IS ALSO PART OF THE PROBLEM.WESTON MAILED A LETTER OF CONCERN TO ADAMS
WITH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. ADAMS MAY HAVE SPENT AS
MUCH AS 5 MINUTES RESPONDING TO WESTON. IN EFFECT, HE SAID,
"I REALLY DON'T GIVE A DAMN!"FELTON THEN SENT THE FOLLOWING LETTER TO ADAMS:
GUY P. FELTON III
15 August 2008
Mr. Adams:
Can you prove that you were duly elected to your current position in a legitimate manner? The answer is you can not.
How can rational persons treat vote counts as honest and accurate when they are reported by electronic machines which (1) count said votes/blips in secret away from citizen eyeballing, and (2) are not viewed as having any integrity by world-class computer security experts?
As you may know, Nevada employs electronic Sequoia touchscreen voting machines in all counties. Machines of this exact type were "reviewed" in 2007 by California computer security experts and found to be corrupt. They can be easily rigged to throw elections. Said machines have been decertified in California. Experts at Harvard, MIT, Princeton, and Johns Hopkins have confirmed findings issuing from the California review.
You have expressed no public concern with Nevada's use of machines that make it impossible for thoughtful citizens to trust our state's elections system.
Corrupt machines are one problem. Ignoring this problem is a far-worse problem. You are choosing to be a part of the latter. YOU ARE CHOOSING TO IGNORE NEVADA'S CORRUPT VOTING MACHINES!
You are also a public employee who sees nothing wrong with selective law enforcement. You feel yourself to be above the law. Reference no operating and brake lights on your campaign sign trailers. Reference no registration plates on your trailers.
Further, you choose to ignore travesties of justice perpetrated by judges and law enforcement personnel. Mr. Mike Weston recently informed you of his having been defrauded by Fidel Salcedo and Edward Bowers. You responded to Mr. Weston with a letter telling him, in effect, to go to hell.
Mr. Adams, you are clearly unfit to hold any position of public authority. A prayer group of which I am a part will now beseech Divine Providence to remove you from any position of public employment. Only persons possessing sterling integrity and a gut-level commitment to justice should sit on the judicial benches of our nation. You do not qualify.
Guy Felton, Publisher
www.ClickHeer.Com
www.NevadaCorruption.Info
www.CleanElectionsLawsuit.Com
www.HarvardCollegeOnline.Com
RETURN TO NEVADA CORRUPTION DOT INFO
RETURN TO CLEAN ELECTIONS LAWSUIT.COM
RETURN TO ROSS MILLER IS GUILTY OF TREASON
RETURN TO HARVARD COLLEGE ONLINE DOT COM